Reader value first
Articles should help readers understand a term, compare options, or decide what to check next. We avoid filler, hype, and keyword stuffing.
Editorial policy
Outlook IT publishes explainers, tool radars, trend notes, and opportunity briefs about AI search, software, SaaS, and web growth. This policy explains how we choose topics, use sources, update articles, and adapt content for local-language directories.
Evidence over claims
Important claims should be supported by inspectable sources, examples, comparison tables, or documented workflows.
Local context matters
Localized pages should add local search phrases, examples, tool availability, and common questions instead of mirroring English structure.
Source standards
We prefer official documentation, product pages, changelogs, technical posts, public research, pricing pages, and primary-source examples. When using fast-changing product information, articles should name what was checked and leave room for updates.
AI assistance
Outlook IT may use assisted workflows during research and editing, but published pages should still be reviewed for clarity, source quality, local context, and factual plausibility.
Updates
Core pages should include an update log when material changes are made. Updates may be triggered by new product behavior, changed documentation, stronger examples, reader corrections, or market-language shifts.
Corrections
If a page contains unclear wording, outdated information, broken references, or weak local context, readers can contact Outlook IT through the contact page. Corrections should improve the article directly rather than only adding a note.
Independence
Tool pages should distinguish observation from recommendation. A tool can be worth watching without being the best option for every team.